Thy Liberty In Law

Test your knowledge of the Republic of God and Constitutional Law as established by the Law of Equality

(This post is part 9 of a series. Please click here to read all previous posts from earliest to latest.)

If you have read and understood the principles outlined in the previous posts, you will be able to answer all of these questions correctly. Carefully recall the purpose of a republic and the specific function of each of its branches in order to provide the correct answer. Email your answers here.

 

What is wrong with each of these statements?

 

1.    Out of 73 Supreme Court decisions, 32 were decided by 5-4 votes in the 2006-2007 term.   

 

2.    The Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, has asked Congress for the authority to regulate the executives of privately-owned companies.

 

3.    Barack Obama said to a private citizen during his campaign, “I think that when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

 

4.    Our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are endowed upon us directly from God.

 

5.    The California Air Resources Board wants to mandate a “cool paints” initiative to ban automakers from painting their cars black, since black cars absorb light/heat which results in a higher level of fuel consumption/emission in the effort to maintain a cooler interior.

 

6.    Congress and the President want to tax AIG executives’ bonuses at 90%.

 

7.    On the promo to the first season of “The Sons of Anarchy,” a policeman is shown driving next to a member of this gang. The “Sons of Anarchy” member tells the policeman, “We’re all free men, protected by the Constitution.”

 

8.    Government bailouts, earmarks and welfare programs were not what our Founders intended.

 

9.    In FDR’s “Economic Bill of Rights” at the 1944 State of the Union Address, he tells the Congress that some “economic truths have been accepted as self-evident,” among which are the right of every family to a decent home, the right to adequate medical care and the right to a good education.

 

10. The first principle of Glenn Beck’s “Nine Principles” is: “America is good.”

 

(This post is part 8 of a series. Please click here to read all previous posts from earliest to latest.)

 

“Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.”

– Francis Bacon

 

The science of dysfunction has been the most important factor in human progression over the centuries, simply because human beings most often discover truth through the systematic elimination of that which is not true. When early inventors set out to uncover the mathematical truths which would allow them to build a flying machine, they began by eliminating the concepts that, upon experimentation and analysis, did not result in a flying machine. The observation of error offers an opportunity for scientific advancement in that all errors are based on specific, scientific factors. If a flying machine cannot take flight, it is too heavy or does not have proper speed or thrust, etc. If it breaks apart while in flight, it is not strong enough or does not possess the proper shape conducive to flying, etc. Inventors with the intelligence and tenacity to examine and correct the miscalculations of a failed machine are those who will eventually succeed in the production of a functional one, as history has repeatedly shown. In any case, the knowledge of natural law advances through the study of dysfunction or error. The precise manner in which something fails is instrumental in determining the specific type of dysfunction that caused it to fail, which can then be corrected to produce the desired function.

 

The Founders of America, through wisdom and discernment, understood this principle. They recognized that the failure of all forms of government was a universal indication that these governments were constructed in violation of natural law, which was the cause of their dysfunction. When searching for the correct design of government, the Founders were able to use the examples of the Roman, Egyptian, Greek, Persian and other empires as directions for how not to design a government, since these governments - and all governments at that time - were only examples of degeneration and failure. The Founders understood that “in order to form a more perfect union,” ¹ or a government resistant to destruction, they must appeal to the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”²  for the intelligent design of such a government. In other words, they determined that there was a way to construct a government according to the universal laws of intelligent design, aided with the knowledge of countless other methods that were not the way, or were violations of intelligent design.

 

The Founders’ appeal to “Nature’s God” for the correct design of government was answered with a self-evident truth more powerful and revolutionary than any other truth in the known universe – “All men are Created equal.” This natural law exposed the error all forms of government collectively shared – that the men in government were falsely constituted as superior to the governed. At that time, the rulers of nations decreed laws upon their citizens according to their will and pleasure, leaving the citizens no choice but to execute the laws enacted upon them under threat of injury, imprisonment or death. Due to the fact that this government-imposed usurpation of individual liberty always produced degeneration, disorder and destruction, the Founders concluded that all forms of government constituted superior to the people were illegitimate on the basis of natural law. Though their initial understanding of this law was at first flawed - as is the case with many scientific discoveries – “All men are Created equal” as a natural law held the authority to supersede and invalidate all legislation authored by man, and was the law by which early Americans claimed the right to “dissolve the political bands”³ which required their subjection to the British crown.

 

Emboldened by this simple self-evident truth, the law of equality provided Americans with the fortitude to take up arms against the strongest, wealthiest, most formidable military organization on the planet for the preservation of liberty against the destructive rule of kings and tyrants. After securing a nation of their own, Americans proceeded to constitute their government according to the same law they fought for – the only law ever discovered to reflect a mathematically correct formula for government constitution. The Founders’ act of establishing a government according to natural law revealed a concept unlike any other – that government is required to obey law before it is authorized to create law. This requirement subjects the government to the judgment of its people; as executives of the law, the people hold the power to judge their government and its laws for concurrence with the mathematical formula of equality, or (God > man) and (man = man). This executive power of liberty, or the power to confirm and execute law, is held by the people as a check and a balance against government authority. A government subject to the authorizing power of its people for its actions (or consent of the governed) is not superior to but occupies an equal and interdependent relationship with its citizens under God.

 

Here we see the fractal characteristic of the republic of the United States in that its constitution is applicable to the entire nation independent of scale. The requirement that all levels of government – city, state and federal – must conform to the republican model established by the law of equality causes the nation itself to function as a republic. In this republic, the government represents the head or legislative branch and is responsible for authoring law based on mathematical truth, a process we will refer to as localization. The people represent the body or executive branch and are responsible for judging the laws received by the government for concurrence with mathematical truth meaning that each law passed by the government must concur with the law of equality. These two branches form an equal and interdependent relationship in the process of law formation; while government holds authority over the people, the people in turn hold power over their government. However, neither branch can function without God, since God is the constant or source of mathematical truth by which all laws are localized and confirmed. Without God, a republic is false; it has neither authority nor power to create law simply because the rejection of a mathematical source removes the mathematical basis—or basis of truth—for any law it attempts to create. A law without any basis in mathematical truth is a false law; it lacks authority and power in the same manner as the false republic that created it.

 

 

 

 

Because the republic is an institution patterned after the authority/power relationship of the static and active intelligence of our universe, the constitution of the republic of the United States cannot be attributed to the Founders, or any human being for that matter. What the Founders accomplished was the discovery of the natural law of equality which by extension allowed for the discovery of a constitutional republic, since this is the only form of government compatible with this law. By declaring the law of equality the supreme law of the land, or the law by which government constitution and all subsequent laws are based, the Founders succeeded in establishing the only legitimate form of government on the face of the Earth – a republic, or a representative government which operates according to the rule of natural law.

 

Much to our great disadvantage, the careful measures taken by our Founders to establish a government according to intelligent design has been all but erased through the ignorance and confusion of men. Denied a scientific acknowledgement of God and intelligent design, the people who uphold the constitution of the only legitimate form of government ever established are now beginning to question whether such an affirmation of exceptionalism is in violation of some unknown principle of “tolerance.” That government and law could exist in a binary state of true or false is to them an unpalatable proposition which smacks of an absolutism contrary to their interpretation of the principle of “freedom.” Many are under the impression that in order to have freedom, one must have many options of which they are “free” to choose. Thus in order to perpetuate freedom, a “spectrum” of many different forms of government, political philosophies, religions and cultural practices must be tolerated.

 

This perversion of truth has engendered a common ideology that the many designs of government devised by man are equally acceptable, as evidenced by society’s collective acknowledgement of the misrepresentation known as the “political spectrum.” In this “spectrum,” different forms of government are made to appear as if they are equally valid, separated only by personal preference or opinion – as if the selection of a certain type of government is of no greater consequence than the selection of a favorite color. However, whether or not a design is valid has nothing to do with man’s personal preference or opinion but has only to do with whether or not the design is in accordance with natural law. A design that contains even the smallest mathematical inaccuracy cannot qualify as a legitimate design, no matter how many people prefer it.

 

This is where a major flaw in the concept of a “political spectrum” is finally exposed. The clever use of the word “spectrum” implies that the different designs of government in array are each in accordance with natural law, and as such are equally legitimate. The problem with this assumption is that the current spectrum of government designs are in direct conflict with one another, which in and of itself is a mathematical impossibility. Truth cannot conflict with truth; if a conflict exists then it is a conflict of truth against falsehood or falsehood against falsehood. The fact that Americans have applied a word that describes something that is not in conflict with itself – the colors of the spectrum – to describe something that is in conflict with itself – the current two-party political system – reveals an ignorance so dangerous its acceptance by a single generation can cause the greatest superpower in history to come to a crashing end. The natural law our Founders cited is the formula that determines the legitimacy or illegitimacy of any government design, a formula so intolerant that any deviation from it will mathematically result in destruction and death.

 

Because of the universal law of equality, the fraudulent concept of a “political spectrum” is completely shattered as government and law are reduced to a binary expression of true or false, right or wrong, legitimate or illegitimate. A government is either an equally balanced republic constituted according to the law of equality or it is a false republic illegitimately constituted according to inequality. A law created by a government constituted according to equality will inherit the same equality the government itself possesses to the result of life, while a law created by an unequal government will inherit the same inequality the government itself possesses to the result of death. Thus, each law is created in the image of the government that created it. As the true image of government has been already addressed in the two previous posts, it is the false images of government that we will now analyze.

 

The Science of Destruction – False Republics

 

The last post left off on the subject of destruction using the example of the relationship between the electromagnetic and gravitational forces present during the formation of our universe (or more specifically, the influence of these forces on matter during the “big bang”⁴). If these two forces are equal, the universe will become ordered in such a way that will allow for the formation of galaxies and stars and will possess the stable conditions necessary to support life. If they are not equal, the universe will self-destruct in a very predictable manner, a manner which is mathematically determined by the nature of the imbalance itself. If the imbalance is in favor of electromagnetic force, the universe will predictably blow itself apart. If the imbalance is in favor of gravity, the universe will predictably collapse in on itself. Either way, imbalance (or inequality) always results in the destruction and death of the universe according to the nature of the imbalance.

 

Similarly, any imbalance in the constitution of a fractal republic will also result in the destruction and death of that republic according to the nature of the imbalance. Because a republic is a union of human intelligence representing the three equal keys of law formation – active authority, active power, and static authority and power (sealing), the republic is subject to destruction in four possible ways: an imbalance in favor of active authority; an imbalance in favor of active power, and imbalance in favor of active authority and power; or an imbalance in favor of static authority and power. Any imbalance in a republic is due to the execution of inequality by human intelligence through the usurpation or yielding of authority or power, in which the republic will predictably self-destruct according to the branch in which the inequality occurs. Here are the four specific inequalities that result in the destruction of a republic:      

 

1. Active authority key usurps active power key (legislative branch usurps the power of the executive branch to confirm law)

 

2. Active power key usurps active authority key (executive branch usurps the authority of the legislative branch to author law)

 

3. Active authority and power keys usurp static sealing key (legislative and executive branches author and confirm laws which do not concur with the mathematical truth of the judicial branch)

 

4. Static sealing key usurps active authority and power keys (static judicial branch ceases to represent static mathematical truth by attempting to actively author and confirm law in place of the active legislative and executive branches)

 

It is easiest to illustrate this science using real-world examples, so we will repeat each dysfunction as it relates to the government of the United States. In this republic, the Supreme Court represents the judicial branch (static mathematical truth), Congress represents the legislative branch (mathematical truth to authored law), and the President represents the executive branch (confirmation or rejection of authored law based on concurrence with mathematical truth). These are the four ways the United States government can become dysfunctional, in the same order as listed above:

 

1. Congress assumes the power to confirm all legislation, nullifying the requirement for Presidential/executive authorization. (Active authority usurps active power)

 

2. The President assumes the authority to author legislation which he also holds the power to confirm. (Active power usurps active authority)

 

3. Congress and the President author and confirm laws which do not concur with the mathematical truth represented by the Supreme Court. (Active authority and power usurp static authority and power)

 

4. The Supreme Court ceases to represent static mathematical truth and begins to actively legislate and confirm law. (Static authority and power usurp active authority and power)

 

In each scenario, the republic ceases to be an equal representation of the static/active union as one branch assigned to represent static intelligence begins to usurp characteristics of active intelligence and vice-versa. This infringement vacates the natural checks and balances inherent to each branch, nullifying the purpose of the republic itself. If a republic violates its constitution in this manner, it becomes a negation of a republic, or not a republic. A failing or dysfunctional republic will self-destruct according to the nature of its imbalance, which is as scientifically predictable as the destruction of an imbalanced universe. The creation of our universe depended upon the perfect balance of electromagnetic and gravitational forces, forces which by natural law are each associated with a specific direction (as are the two remaining forces, the weak force and the strong force). The direction associated with electromagnetic force (and weak force) is out, while the direction associated with gravitational force (and strong force) is in. These two directions, out and in, happen to be the only two directions in the universe. An imbalance in favor of “out” will blow itself apart while an imbalance in favor of “in” will collapse in on itself.     

 

A close study of the relationship of static and active intelligence reveals that there is also a specific direction associated with each intelligence, a direction which likewise mathematically determines its demise upon imbalance. Recall that static intelligence is universal and the origin of truth (the alpha, or beginning of law formation), while active intelligence is local and the confirmer of truth (the omega, or end of law formation). Static intelligence, as the origin of mathematical truth, is associated with an outward direction, as truth figuratively waits to be received by active intelligence and made into law. Active (human) intelligence, as the local receiver of truth is associated with an inward direction, as man receives mathematical truth and subsequently authors and confirms it into law. This means anything that represents static intelligence is associated with an outward direction and anything that represents active intelligence is associated with an inward direction. In a republic, the static-active union is represented in two possible ways – from top to bottom and from left to right. The top and left side of the republic represent out and the bottom and right side of the republic represent in. Thus any imbalance in favor of the sealing or authority key will cause the republic to blow itself apart, and any imbalance in favor of the power key or both the active authority and power keys will cause the republic to collapse in on itself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In a way, we have witnessed the implosion or explosion of societies, economies and governments throughout history. We have not, however, understood the science behind this dysfunction, simply because there has been no available natural law by which to test this dysfunction against. If one does not know the proper order of government, then it is extremely difficult to understand the causes that contribute to its disorder. However, due to the rediscovery of the law of equality, we now possess the natural law that determines the proper order of government: an equally balanced constitutional republic. Because the republic is the only design consistent with this law, all republics retain identical constitutions independent of scale and as such share the same image. The name of this image is God, which is the title used in reference to the universal republic responsible for the creation of all things including man and his equality. The republic of God retains a constitution in accordance with natural law enabling it to create law on a continuous, universal scale - hence its obedience to law authorizes its ability to create law. All other designs for government in conflict with the image of God carry another name, a name or title historically used in reference to that which exists in opposition to God, or in other words, in opposition to natural law. The name of this disorder of government is Satan.

 

In a word, any philosophy, belief or action that does not concur with the law of equality (or mathematical truth) is Satanic, and all Satanic philosophies or actions can be categorized under one of the four Satanic images, or one of the four republican dysfunctions listed above. The four republican dysfunctions are more commonly known as Fascism (imbalance in favor of authority), Socialism (imbalance in favor of power), Communism (imbalance in favor of active authority and power), and Totalitarianism (imbalance in favor of sealing or static authority and power). Fascism and totalitarianism will cause the republic to blow itself apart, and socialism and communism will cause the republic to collapse in on itself. In any case, destruction and death is always the result of an imbalanced republic, the manner of which is determined by the nature of the imbalance itself.

 

 

 

 

As an example, the United States of America owes its existence to the Satanic image held by its mother country, Great Britain. The British government, or monarchy, patterned after a long-established philosophy known as the “Divine Right of Kings”⁵  is classified under the Satanic image of fascism, otherwise known as a tyranny or dictatorship. In this false republic, government authority usurps the power of the people to confirm law, as all laws are authored and confirmed by government and imposed upon the people by force. This expansion of authority, or imbalance in favor of the head, causes the body, or the people, to become repelled by their government, and the entire republic begins to self-destruct in favor of an outward direction, eventually blowing itself apart. The mass migration of British subjects (and others) to the American colonies was a direct result of the dysfunction of fascism, which is the same dysfunction causing mass migration in the world today. Though the British tried to correct this imbalance through the “Glorious Revolution” and other such incremental acknowledgements of human liberty over the centuries, without the law of equality they could never attain the mathematically correct image of God, or the perfect balance of authority and power. History reveals that the British Empire went from one Satanic image to another as it blew itself apart as a result of its fascism in the years following WWII through the loss of many of its territories, and has since acquired the Satanic image of socialism where the people once repelled by their government are now dependent upon it, which dependency causes the nation to collapse in on itself, or decline.

 

This is a science that can be applied to any individual, group, society or nation independent of time, location or scale. Human behavior, like everything else in the universe, is at all times subject to natural law. This means that every aspect of human activity has a mathematically predetermined outcome, making the prediction of future events a scientific reality. Under this science, all aspects of human behavior and philosophy – religious, cultural and political – can be defined in terms of true and false. The only obstacle to this science is an ideology, a specific cultural philosophy that condemns such discriminations as socially unacceptable. This is known as the philosophy of “tolerance.”     

 

 

The Current Barrier to Scientific Progress: The Philosophy of “Tolerance”

 

Scientific progress in any society is directly proportional to the level⁶ of equality executed by its inhabitants. The principle of equality provides for the establishment of law and order, which in turn provides the social stability necessary for individuals to devote their time and energy to seek, test and prove universal truths. Inhabitants of civilized societies have taken note of the invariable relationship between equality and scientific progress, but because of the prevailing view that God and science are in conflict, the scientific connection of equality to God is overlooked and a false connection of equality to “tolerance” is inserted in its place. The prevailing cultural philosophy in America today is that equality is attained through a principle of “tolerance,” or that equality is achieved when all members of a society tolerate, permit or accept the philosophies held by others, even if such beliefs are incompatible with their own. In such an environment, those who continue to assert truth and falsehood are considered in breach of the principle of “tolerance,” where an acknowledgement of truth amounts to a subversion of equality. The “intolerant” are then vilified as the enemies of equality, and thus become the enemies of scientific progress.

 

When a civilized society begins a philosophical attack on truth itself, it is the burden of science to disprove the offending philosophy. Because it has become socially unacceptable to subject the philosophies of men to the scientific method under the principle of “tolerance,” the question must be asked: Is “tolerance” a principle?

 

The answer: No.

 

Tolerance has no basis in static mathematical truth, so it cannot be defined or exist as a principle.⁷ A principle is a law; law is constituted by a mathematical source (judicial), an authored statement (legislative), and an active confirmation of the authored statement (executive). Without a mathematical origin, no law can ever be authored which defines to what extent one human being must “tolerate” the beliefs and practices of another. “Tolerance” is and ever will be defined by human intelligence alone, and will possess as many different definitions as there are human beings to define it. “Tolerance,” as mere human opinion, is therefore the exact opposite of a principle, and because it is not a principle there is nothing that can possibly act in violation of it.     

 

The universal process of law formation reveals that the concept of “tolerance” in America has been authored by the executive branch, a branch that holds no authority to author law. “Tolerance,” as an unwritten rule, is an unconstitutional concept as it is neither based in mathematical truth nor authored by a governing branch but is devised solely by society, the people or the executive branch of the nation. Any republic that allows the usurpation of authority by executive power becomes disordered after the Satanic image of socialism, and the republic begins the process of collapsing in on itself so long as the republic allows the usurpation to continue.⁸

 

 

In our very first application of the science of constitutional law, the prevailing American cultural philosophy of tolerance has been thoroughly discredited, clearing the way for the scientific study of the philosophies of men. It is science, not religion, which will ultimately reveal the correct religious philosophy. It is science, not culture, which will conclusively determine the correct cultural traditions. It is science, not politics, which will finally prove the correct political ideology. It is science, through natural law, that holds the answers to all of life’s most perplexing and persistent questions. Science has always been the means by which the world’s most controversial and oft-debated subjects have been resolved. Only this time, it’s personal.

 

 

 

 

FOOTNOTES

 

1. United States Constitution, text (1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.)

 

2. United States Declaration of Independence, text (1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.)

 

3. Ibid.

 

4. “First, the mean density of matter in the universe at the very beginning has to be within 1 part in 10⁶⁰ of the so-called ‘critical density’ which demarcates universes which are open (expanding forever) from those which are closed (recollapse to a big ‘crunch’). If the density is smaller than it is by this amount then the universe will expand far too quickly for galaxies and stars to be able to form. If it is greater then the whole universe will recollapse under gravity in just a few months. Either way, you have a boring universe with no possibility of life. An accuracy of 1 part in 10⁶⁰ is that required to aim a gun at a coin 14 billion light years away at the opposite end of the universe and hit it!”

- Rodney D. Holder, “Is the Universe Designed?” Faraday Paper No 10 (The Faraday Institute For Science And Religion April 2007, http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/faraday/Papers.php)

 

 

“Not only would tinkering with gravity change the stars and planets, it would also alter the cosmos as a whole. For example, the expansion of the universe must be carefully balanced with the deceleration caused by gravity. Too much expansion energy and the atoms would fly apart before stars and galaxies could form; too little, and the universe would collapse before stars and galaxies could form.”
- Guillermo Gonzalez, Jay Wesley Richards, “The Privileged Planet” p. 204

 

5. Divine Right of Kings, ancient doctrine that sovereigns are representatives of God and derive their right to rule directly from God. The concept was formulated from the theocracies of the East. Before the Reformation, the monarch was considered God’s representative in all secular matters. Following the Reformation, in Protestant countries, the ruler filled this function in religious matters also. According to the doctrine, a ruler’s power is not subject to secular limitation; the ruler is responsible only to God. In the 17th century the doctrine was supported by the English Royalists against the Parliamentarians, who maintained that the exercise of political power springs from the will of the people.

“Divine Right of Kings,” Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2008
http://encarta.msn.com © 1997-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557254/Divine_Right_of_Kings.html

 

6. “Level” means proportion of the people, frequency of execution and overall executive accuracy to the mathematical formula of equality, see Laying Down the Law Part II – The Conclusion

 

7. Principle – A fundamental, primary, or general law or truth from which others are derived: The principles of modern physics.

Dictionary.com Unabridged http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/principle

Based on the Random House Dictionary, Copyright Random House, Inc. 2006.

 

8. The false principle of “tolerance” (though exposed in American society as a socialist philosophy caused by an imbalance in favor of power) can cause the republic to take on any of the Satanic images depending on the actions of the branches. Tolerance can be a fascist ideology if the governing branch of a nation forces its people to execute the definition of tolerance it has imposed. Tolerance can become a communist ideology if both the legislative and executive branches of the nation – the government and the people – author and execute false laws of tolerance in defiance of mathematical truth. If no false laws of tolerance have been enacted by the active branches but the judicial branch or courts create rulings based on their own definition of tolerance, the ideology has become totalitarian.

 

 

 

“However, if we discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable by everyone, not just by a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we should know the mind of God.”

– Stephen Hawking, “A Brief History of Time” 

 

Before we move on to the next science, I think it’s important to briefly summarize the subject matter of the last five posts. First, we have to wrap our minds around the fact that the field of science is now equipped to analyze the existence and nature of God, just like any other subject. What might have prevented scientists from studying God in the past was a temptation to analyze God as defined by various religious observers, many of which describe their God as unknowable or outside the realm of science. However, scientists who are successful in their studies begin with natural laws; they seek to discover the laws that govern the subject in question and research the effects of such laws impartially.

 

As an example, Newton’s study of the phenomenon of gravity did not involve an investigation of what everyone else believed gravity to be, a denunciation of such theories as nonsensical and a conclusion that the subject of gravity is unknowable or outside the realm of science, though this is the way some scientists currently behave toward the subject of God. Instead of following a well-documented procedure known as “the scientific method,” some scientists have disregarded the search for proof of God through natural law and have focused their efforts on deriding the various definitions and depictions of God compiled over the centuries by man. Finding these depictions unsupported by science, the entire subject of God and religion are deemed unknowable by some and ridiculous, aberrant, or even dangerous by others. As entertaining as it may be to sit in judgment of every religious theory invented or discovered, this is not the function of science. The function of science is to provide scientific definitions for all things which can be tested and proven for truth; once a definition is established, all things that do not concur with that definition are, by default, false. It is therefore nothing but a waste of time for anyone to ridicule mankind’s relative definitions of God and religion. A scientific definition of God will automatically invalidate any religion whose god exists in opposition to it.

 

In our case, the scientific definition of God emerged in a circuitous manner. Instead of testing man’s various depictions of God for truth, we began with an analysis on the application of law. Because all things were found to exist according to law (intelligent design), we then moved on to the origin of law, whether law is established by an internal or external source. Because all things lack the authority to author a single law governing their functionality, the origin of law is external, which means that an external source of intelligence must exist which possesses the ability to create and execute law. This external source of law established a scientific basis for the possibility of creation, which led us to consider any natural laws that might include a creator.

 

The possibility of a creator was found in the self-evident truth that “All men are created equal.” This law enabled us to test whether the equality of man was dependent upon a creator, which test proved positive. The final test was an analysis of whether the equality of man causes mankind to become functional or dysfunctional, which in all cases, equality causes function (the specifics of man’s functionality will be demonstrated shortly). Function, in mathematical terms, is synonymous with truth, which means that the mathematical formula for equality—(God > man) and (man = man)—is true, enabling us to recognize it as a natural law.

This is how we came to prove the existence of God: through the examination of natural law, and not through the consideration of any of man’s arbitrary definitions.

 

As was demonstrated in the last post, the law of equality provided us with much more than the existence of a Creator. This law allowed us to uncover a testable scientific description of this Creator complete with purpose, function, and mathematical imagery. Because of this law, instead of being limited to the mere study of natural laws, all of mankind is allowed to observe the process by which these laws are created in the first place—through an equally branched republic constituted along the lines of the static/active union. This republic is known as God.

 

The previous post offered a description of the scientific constitution of this republic, a description which at first might have seemed a bit complicated. However, once we apply a few real-world examples, it will be evident that human beings have been employing this pattern throughout history. While the republic of God is most easily compared to the republic of the United States, it must be noted that anything which creates and executes law is, in fact, a republic. Businesses, sports organizations, religious institutions, universities, even human beings themselves are all forms of republics which create and execute law.

 

To illustrate, let’s first apply this pattern to sports. In a sport such as football where laws are established, the branches of government are naturally divided along the lines of authority and power in the same manner as is the republic of God. The judicial branch is represented by the referees who represent static mathematical truth (equality) or the rules of the game, and serve as static binary judges over the actions of the active legislative and executive branches. The legislative branch is represented by the coaches, who hold the authority to author the laws or write the game plan/actions of the team according to the rules. The executive branch is represented by the players, who hold the power to confirm and execute the laws or game plan authored by the legislative branch on the condition that the laws are based on the rules. Together, the referees, coaches and players form an equally balanced government capable of creating and executing law for their sport, which government will endure until the law of equality is violated by the enactment of false law or when one branch begins to usurp the authority or power of the other branches.

 

 

 

 

In a corporation, this same construct applies. The judicial branch is represented by the board of directors who represent static mathematical truth (equality) or the rules of the business, and serve as static binary judges over the actions of the active legislative and executive branches. The legislative branch is represented by the president, who holds the authority to author the laws, or the actions, of the company. The executive branch is represented by the chief executive officer, who holds the power to confirm and execute the laws authored by the legislative branch on the condition that the laws are based on the rules of the business. Together, the board, president and chief executive officer form an equally balanced government capable of creating and executing law for the corporation, which government will endure until the law of equality is violated by the enactment of false law or when one branch begins to usurp the authority or power of the other branches.

 

 

 

In engineering, construction, manufacturing, or any type of field where something is produced, the republic is essential. First, mathematical truth (judicial) is authored into a design, a compilation of statements and formulas proposing the function of the building or machine (legislative). Once the proposal is confirmed, or judged to be in accordance with mathematical truth, the design is then executed or physically built and brought into existence (executive). If the laws for the building or machine are in accordance with mathematical truth, it will function. If not, it will be dysfunctional and subject to destruction.

 

 

 

Human beings are perfect examples of republics, whether we are aware of it or not. Each individual possesses an active legislative branch, or head, that is designed to author the laws or actions of the republic as a whole. These proposed laws are passed to the executive branch, or body, which is designed to judge these laws for concurrence with mathematical truth and then execute or carry out the confirmed laws. These two active branches are sealed together by a static judicial branch, or conscience, which serves as a static binary judge over the actions of the active branches. Laws (or actions) that concur with the mathematical law of equality allow the human republic to retain its liberty, or the power to continue to confirm and execute law. Laws that violate the mathematical law of equality destroy individual liberty, and the person loses the power to confirm and execute law.

 

 

 

These are only a few of the countless ways in which human beings naturally form republics, giving a whole new meaning to the religious expression, “God is everywhere.” Indeed, the image of God is found in all things, due to the fact that God exists as a republic. Because all things exist according to intelligent design laws, all things in existence are executions of law. Law is the product of a republic, which means that everything in existence can be traced back to the republic responsible for its creation. Republics are fractal, which means that each republic can also be traced back to the republic responsible for its creation, resulting in an infinite ancestry of republican governments. The republic is the creator of all things.

 

This is where we can begin to comprehend the importance of human intelligence and human liberty. Because human beings are the only forms of active intelligence that can distinguish mathematical truth from that which is not mathematical truth, only human beings can author, confirm and execute mathematical truth, or create law. The fact that law is something only human intelligence can create substantiates the statement in the last post that, “Everything in our universe, from the largest star to the smallest subatomic particle, subsists on human liberty.“

 

Up until this point, we have focused only on the science of a functional republic. We have uncovered the natural law that constitutes it and maintains its functionality – the law of equality. It is easy to see how the physical universe can be so ordered, reliable, and wondrously perfect when it has been created by a similarly ordered, reliable, and wondrously perfect republic. So far, the republic of God has not made any mistakes in the process of law formation. All the laws in the universe concur with mathematical truth, which means that God’s republic has correctly authored, confirmed and executed everything in existence.

 

However, just because all human beings are executions of the law that “All men are created equal” does not mean that all men remain in this equal state. Natural laws formed by the republic of God exist as static mathematical truth to man, and as a new iteration of human intelligence, it is man’s purpose and function to correctly author this truth into written laws and confirm and execute these laws according to the republican model. This means that God’s creation of man is in turn a creation of a new fractal republic, with God as the judicial branch and man as the active legislative and executive branches.

 

 

 

Of course, though the natural law of equality has always existed, it took man until 1776 A.D. to formally and correctly author this law and an even longer time to get around to the confirmation and execution of it (which execution is sporadic and inconsistent at best). This begs the question: what is the scientific consequence of man’s ignorance, repudiation, or denial of natural law?

 

In the previous posts it was demonstrated that static and active intelligence have an interdependent relationship, a relationship which forms the basis for law formation. Static intelligence is the origin of truth, and active (human) intelligence authors, confirms and executes truth, enabling truth to become law. On the other hand, if human intelligence can confirm truth, humans must likewise possess the ability to reject truth or at least prevent it from becoming formal law, either deliberately or ignorantly (consider the history of humanity prior to 1776). But the rejection of truth by human intelligence assumes that we have a hand in creating it, which as active intelligences, we do not. Therefore, a “rejection” of truth, or a refusal by man to author and execute the laws established by God, is not so much a rejection but rather an active confirmation of the opposite of the law in question—what we will refer to as a negation of law.

 

Anything that exists as truth creates or causes that which is not true, which means that all natural laws have negations, or that which exists in opposition to the law. If man does not confirm and execute the natural laws governing the creation of fire (heat, oxygen, fuel) then the result is the negation of fire – or not fire. If man does not confirm and execute the natural laws governing the creation of an electrical current, then the result is the negation of an electrical current – or not an electrical current. In this case, if man does not confirm and execute the natural law governing man’s equality, then the result is the negation of equality – or not equality, which of course is referred to as inequality. This means that instead of possessing a true ability to reject natural laws, human intelligence which refuses to confirm and execute the natural law of equality is by default confirming and executing its negation. Because the law of equality can be broken down into its correct mathematical formula, the formula for inequality must be a negation, or the mathematical opposite, of equality.

 

Let’s compare the law of equality and its negation side by side. Again, here is the mathematical formula for equality as described in “Laying Down The Law.”

 

(God > man) and (man = man) = equality

 

According to this law, man was intelligently designed to function with God as his superior and with man as his equal, which law results in continuous function, or in other words, eternal life.

 

((God > man) and (man = man) = equality) = Eternal Life

 

Because this law is universally true, we must now revisit the formula for inequality which was briefly suggested in the post “Laying Down The Law Part II – The Conclusion” as simply (man > man) = inequality. The fact that inequality must be a negation, or the complete opposite of, the law of equality requires a revision of this formula.

 

 

The Formula for Inequality – A Negation of Equality

 

According to equality, the correct order of God and man places God first and man second. For inequality, the arrangement must be incorrectly inversed.

 

man, God 

 

As the Creator of man, God must be superior to man. For inequality, man would falsely assume a position superior to or greater than his Creator.

 

man > God

 

The falsely assumed position of superiority over one’s Creator effectively nullifies any legal basis for the equality of man, so the mathematical result of this arrangement is the inequality of man by default.

 

man > God  =  man not equal to man  (not equal is written as !=)

 

This formula is a description of the opposite of equality, which of course is inequality:

 

(man > God) = (man != man) = inequality

 

Last, because the formula for equality is mathematically true, its execution yields continuous function, or eternal life. Because inequality is mathematically false, its execution must yield dysfunction and death.

 

((man > God) = (man != man) = inequality) = Death

 

Here we see that the formula for inequality is a complete negation of equality. Because the law of equality first requires the recognition of a superior God, the formula for inequality must first include the repudiation of the superiority of God by man, who places himself above his Creator. This arrangement is mathematically false because that which is created cannot be greater than, or precede, that which created it. In this arrangement, man effectively nullifies his own equality among men due to the fact that equality only exists by way of his Creator. Because all men are created equal, man’s attempt to rule over another is first a false repudiation of God and second a false arrangement of man.

 

The significance of the negation of the natural law of equality is that any man who does not confirm and execute the natural law of equality is by default confirming and executing its negation. This means that each of man’s actions is an execution of equality or inequality; man is either correctly placing God above himself and his fellow man equal to himself, or man is incorrectly placing himself above God and his fellow man unequal to himself. The ability of man to choose whether to confirm and execute equality or inequality reveals a paradoxical characteristic of this natural law, in that the law of equality establishes a classification of superiority and inferiority among men. The superior man is he that chooses to confirm and execute the true law of equality, which results in endurance, function and life. The inferior man is he that chooses to confirm and execute the false law of inequality, or who simply disregards the law of equality in which he then by default confirms and executes inequality to the result of dysfunction, destruction, and death. Because function and life are always superior to destruction and death, the man that chooses to execute equality will always be superior to the man that chooses to execute inequality.

 

Though the study of this subject is laborious and taxing, the knowledge of the law of equality and its negation is the necessary foundation for the complete understanding of all human past, present and future. Without this natural law, there is no scientific explanation for the failure or dysfunction of society, economy, government, or any institution created by man. We are left to wonder why it is that some businesses fail while others succeed, why some families disintegrate while others progress, why some nations degenerate while others prosper. Without this law we are only able to speculate on the consequences of legislation implemented by government and the repercussions of social or cultural permutations. Currently, the study of the patterns and outcomes of human behavior are considered “soft sciences,” or “social” sciences which cannot be researched quantitatively because of the lack of any specific math-based physical law governing the function of human beings. Of course, the law of equality completely destroys this premise.

 

The natural law of equality and its negation establishes the mathematical foundation for the scientific study of humanity. Man is a republic constituted by the law of equality; any execution of inequality will cause a republic to self-destruct according to the nature of the imbalance. Recall the example at the end of the post “Laying Down The Law Part II – The Conclusion,” how the existence of the universe is dependent upon the perfect equality of the two creative forces of electromagnetism and gravity. If these two forces are equal, life will flourish and endure. If they are not equal, the universe will self-destruct in a predictable manner, a manner which is mathematically determined by the nature of the imbalance itself. If the imbalance is in favor of electromagnetic force, the universe will predictably blow itself apart. If the imbalance is in favor of gravity, the universe will predictably collapse in on itself. Either way, imbalance (or inequality) will always result in the destruction and death of the universe according to the nature of the imbalance.

 

Similarly, any imbalance in the constitution of a fractal republic will also result in the destruction and death of that republic according to the nature of the imbalance. Because a republic is a representative union of the three equal keys of law formation – active authority, active power, and static authority and power (sealing), the republic is subject to destruction in four possible ways: an imbalance in favor of active authority; an imbalance in favor of active power; an imbalance in favor of active authority and power; or an imbalance in favor of static authority and power (sealing). Each imbalance causes a very specific type of dysfunction, in the same way that imbalances in any organism – cars, computers, bodies – cause specific types of dysfunction. The dysfunction and death of all republics is the next science we will examine, but this science is not without controversy. To some, this science will be the “ultimate triumph of human reason” anticipated by Stephen Hawking in the quote above, and to others, it will rock the very foundation of their existence. What we as human beings must keep in mind is that we have been intelligently designed to function according to a specific mathematical formula. And the defining characteristic of mathematics is intolerance.

 (This post is part 6 of a series. Please click here to read all previous posts from earliest to latest. )

 

The emergence of two newly rediscovered truths in the four previous posts completely revolutionizes all branches of scientific study and practice. First, it is a fact that all things in existence are intelligently designed, which establishes ordered law as the foundation of the universe. Second, it is also a fact that each ordered law can be expressed in the language of mathematics and authored into legible statements and formulas, as evidenced by the law of equality. In addition to these truths is a third and final truth which will ultimately reveal the complete design of the universe itself. The remaining element in a universe constructed of law is whether or not such laws are acknowledged (confirmed) and implemented (executed).

 

It is at this point where we begin to discover the role human beings have been designed to fill in this universe. Human beings differ from all other forms of active intelligence in that they are the only organisms capable of comprehending natural laws. From 1 + 1 = 2 to E=mc², human beings are the only life forms endowed with the necessary intelligence to distinguish natural law from that which is not natural law. This capacity for judgment reveals in no uncertain terms that human beings were designed to comprehend, confirm, and execute all of the natural laws of the universe. The power to confirm and execute law is called agency, or liberty.

 

Liberty, like equality, is often cited but rarely understood. To understand the true principle of liberty, we must revisit the natural construct of the universe described in “Laying Down The Law,” which construct is the simultaneous separation and union of static and active intelligence. These two types of intelligence naturally divide the universe into two separate branches, with each branch providing a necessary element, or key, to the formation of law. Static intelligence provides authority; it is the branch which holds the authority to originate truth, which is the alpha or beginning of law formation. Active intelligence provides power; it is the branch which holds the power to confirm and execute truth, which is the omega or end of law formation. Together, these interdependent branches produce all natural laws. This design reveals more about the true nature of our universe than has ever before been considered in the realm of science, by allowing us to uncover the designated process by which all natural laws are created. Because of this process, the universe in its entirety now has a scientifically substantiated purpose and function. The purpose of static and active intelligence is to become unified, and their joint function is to create and execute truth, or law. In short, the fundamental construct of the universe is a government; its sole function is the creation and execution of law.

 

 

 

Since human beings are the only forms of active intelligence with the ability to discern mathematical truth and are therefore the only life forms capable of comprehending, confirming and executing natural law, it is entirely logical to assume that the government of the universe is a union of static truth and human intelligence, with static mathematical truth providing the origin of law and human beings providing the liberty, or the confirmation and execution of the law in which the law becomes complete. This simple description of government provides yet another astonishing revelation. Everything in our universe, from the largest star to the smallest subatomic particle, subsists on human liberty. Without human beings, nothing could exist physically, as static truth can create nothing of itself but is interdependent on the power of human liberty for creative organization.

 

The fact that things exist physically, are intelligently designed, and adhere to natural laws informs us that a government made up of static and human intelligence already exists. The proven law of equality now enables us to make our very first scientific classification: The name of this unified government is what we call ”God.” God is the name or title of the marriage, or union, of static truth and human intelligence, and as an institution possessing the keys of both authority and power, is responsible for the confirmation and execution of static truth, including the creation of elemental active intelligence and its subsequent organization into living organisms. This explains why all things exist according to ordered law (or intelligent design): because all things are products of a government institution whose sole function is the creation and execution of law.

 

The knowledge of this foundational government is the most important piece of information any human being can possibly obtain. Its existence reveals that the purpose and function of man is the same as the purpose and function of God. It is man’s purpose and function to create and execute law in the same manner as does the universe - within governments constituted according to the pattern the universe has established. Because the definition of God is based on natural law, it is now possible to make scientific statements that we could not make before. It is a scientific fact that all things are intelligently designed by God. It is a scientific fact that God is a government institution made up of static and human intelligence (due to the fact that no other intelligence can comprehend natural law). It is a scientific fact that God is the source of all creation, and operates in the language of mathematical truth, or natural law. It is a scientific fact that God is a government constituted of equal and interdependent branches. These statements, though verifiably true, only offer superficial information about the institution of God. What we need now are the specifics.

 

What is the constitution of “God?”

 

To study the constitution of God, let us start with what we already know. Initially, there exist only two equal interdependent branches of intelligence, each with their own unique contribution to the legislative process. Each branch possesses its own key – the key to originate law or the key to confirm and execute law. The universal necessity of these two keys for law formation demonstrates ironically that there is a natural law governing law creation, which requires all forms of government to be constituted in a specific way. The natural law is the equal interdependence of authority and power; that which originates law has no power to confirm and execute it, and that which confirms and executes law has no authority to originate it. This is the fundamental check and balance between authority and power that static and active (or in this case, human) intelligence inherently possess upon each other.

 

 

 

A closer look at this construct reveals that although the universe is separated by two intelligence types, government does not and cannot function with only two branches, due to the nature of the intelligence involved. Because static intelligence is intangible and therefore does not have power to express itself in any physical way, human intelligence cannot confirm and execute law directly from this branch. For this reason, static truth must first be authored into legible statements or formulas by active intelligence before such statements can be confirmed and executed. This necessitates the formation of an active legislative branch to succeed the static branch in physically authoring the mathematical truth that static intelligence has created. After static truth has been actively authored by a legislative branch, this same branch cannot proceed to confirm and execute the law it has just authored, lest it violate the universally distinct separation of authority and power. For this reason, a third and final executive branch must then succeed the legislative branch in authorizing (or confirming) and executing the laws that have been authored.

 

 

 

All together, government constituted by natural law is a combination of three keys, or a union of the three separate and equal branches necessary for law formation, arranged in the progressive order of static to active. The first branch is the static truth from which all laws are originated. The second branch is the active legislative branch, or the branch that holds the authority to author static truth into written laws. The third and final branch is the active executive branch, which holds the power to confirm and execute the laws received by the legislative branch. This knowledge leads us to our second scientific classification: God, the universal government responsible for the creation of all natural law and all physical organisms, is a Republic, or a representative government which operates according to the rule of natural law.

 

Unfortunately, the image of this government does not add up – so far. There are two perplexing issues, one logical and the other mathematical, that must be resolved before we can begin to understand this arrangement in its entirety. The logical issue is, how can static and active intelligence form a unified government in the first place?

 

The fact that static intelligence is truly static and does not exist physically poses a problem for its intended unification with active human intelligence. Human beings cannot physically unify with something that is intangible. For this reason, human intelligence must come to represent the union of static and active intelligence in government, which requires active intelligence to act, or represent, each key in the process of law formation. It is easiest to comprehend this type of representation using the two active branches of government as examples, which are the legislative and the executive. Although human intelligence cannot originate law of itself, no form of government can function without the written law. Therefore, human beings must act, or represent, the static universe in this regard. The legislative branch of every government represents authority, or the authoring of law, even though human beings do not possess universal authority. The authored laws are then passed to the executive branch which represents the power of human liberty, or the power of human intelligence to judge the correctness of the authored law by analyzing its concurrence with mathematical truth. True laws are confirmed and executed by the power of the executive branch; false laws are rejected. The fact that these two active branches are representative of both authority and power leads us to our second issue.

 

The second problem we encounter is a mathematical one: if both the authority and power keys are represented by the legislative and executive branches respectively, what key does the static branch possess in a republic? If there are only two keys, or parts, to legislation in the universe but three keys are required for government function, then this must mean that one of the keys of either authority or power is represented twice, causing a potential imbalance in a government supposedly based on equality. Let us now consider the function of the static branch to uncover whether this republic is imbalanced in favor of authority or power.

 

The static branch in a republic is the branch responsible for the origination of mathematical truth, the initial element of law. As the origin of mathematics, it is responsible for the association of truth to endurance and life and falseness to destruction and death, a manifestation of its own sagacious nature. By mathematically associating truth with life and falsehood with death, the static universe has secured an ironclad defense against active branches that create and execute false law: all active intelligence engaged in authoring and executing false law, or law which does not concur with mathematical truth, are statically sentenced to destruction and death. Conversely, active intelligence w