“However, if we discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable by everyone, not just by a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we should know the mind of God.”

– Stephen Hawking, “A Brief History of Time”

Before we move on to the next science, I think it’s important to briefly summarize the subject matter of the last five posts. First, we have to wrap our minds around the fact that the field of science is now equipped to analyze the existence and nature of God, just like any other subject. What might have prevented scientists from studying God in the past was a temptation to analyze God as defined by various religious observers, many of which describe their God as unknowable or outside the realm of science. However, scientists who are successful in their studies begin with natural laws; they seek to discover the laws that govern the subject in question and research the effects of such laws impartially.

As an example, Newton’s study of the phenomenon of gravity did not involve an investigation of what everyone else believed gravity to be, a denunciation of such theories as nonsensical and a conclusion that the subject of gravity is unknowable or outside the realm of science, though this is the way some scientists currently behave toward the subject of God. Instead of following a well-documented procedure known as “the scientific method,” some scientists have disregarded the search for proof of God through natural law and have focused their efforts on deriding the various definitions and depictions of God compiled over the centuries by man. Finding these depictions unsupported by science, the entire subject of God and religion are deemed unknowable by some and ridiculous, aberrant, or even dangerous by others. As entertaining as it may be to sit in judgment of every religious theory invented or discovered, this is not the function of science. The function of science is to provide scientific definitions for all things which can be tested and proven for truth; once a definition is established, all things that do not concur with that definition are, by default, false. It is therefore nothing but a waste of time for anyone to ridicule mankind’s relative definitions of God and religion. A scientific definition of God will automatically invalidate any religion whose god exists in opposition to it.

In our case, the scientific definition of God emerged in a circuitous manner. Instead of testing man’s various depictions of God for truth, we began with an analysis on the application of law. Because all things were found to exist according to law (intelligent design), we then moved on to the origin of law, whether law is established by an internal or external source. Because all things lack the authority to author a single law governing their functionality, the origin of law is external, which means that an external source of intelligence must exist which possesses the ability to create and execute law. This external source of law established a scientific basis for the possibility of creation, which led us to consider any natural laws that might include a creator.

The possibility of a creator was found in the self-evident truth that “All men are created equal.” This law enabled us to test whether the equality of man was dependent upon a creator, which test proved positive. The final test was an analysis of whether the equality of man causes mankind to become functional or dysfunctional, which in all cases, equality causes function (the specifics of man’s functionality will be demonstrated shortly). Function, in mathematical terms, is synonymous with truth, which means that the mathematical formula for equality—(God > man) and (man = man)—is true, enabling us to recognize it as a natural law.

This is how we came to prove the existence of God: through the examination of natural law, and not through the consideration of any of man’s arbitrary definitions.

As was demonstrated in the last post, the law of equality provided us with much more than the existence of a Creator. This law allowed us to uncover a testable scientific description of this Creator complete with purpose, function, and mathematical imagery. Because of this law, instead of being limited to the mere study of natural laws, all of mankind is allowed to observe the process by which these laws are created in the first place—through an equally branched republic constituted along the lines of the static/active union. This republic is known as God.

The previous post offered a description of the scientific constitution of this republic, a description which at first might have seemed a bit complicated. However, once we apply a few real-world examples, it will be evident that human beings have been employing this pattern throughout history. While the republic of God is most easily compared to the republic of the United States, it must be noted that anything which creates and executes law is, in fact, a republic. Businesses, sports organizations, religious institutions, universities, even human beings themselves are all forms of republics which create and execute law.

To illustrate, let’s first apply this pattern to sports. In a sport such as football where laws are established, the branches of government are naturally divided along the lines of authority and power in the same manner as is the republic of God. The judicial branch is represented by the referees who represent static mathematical truth (equality) or the rules of the game, and serve as static binary judges over the actions of the active legislative and executive branches. The legislative branch is represented by the coaches, who hold the authority to author the laws or write the game plan/actions of the team according to the rules. The executive branch is represented by the players, who hold the power to confirm and execute the laws or game plan authored by the legislative branch on the condition that the laws are based on the rules. Together, the referees, coaches and players form an equally balanced government capable of creating and executing law for their sport, which government will endure until the law of equality is violated by the enactment of false law or when one branch begins to usurp the authority or power of the other branches.

In a corporation, this same construct applies. The judicial branch is represented by the board of directors who represent static mathematical truth (equality) or the rules of the business, and serve as static binary judges over the actions of the active legislative and executive branches. The legislative branch is represented by the president, who holds the authority to author the laws, or the actions, of the company. The executive branch is represented by the chief executive officer, who holds the power to confirm and execute the laws authored by the legislative branch on the condition that the laws are based on the rules of the business. Together, the board, president and chief executive officer form an equally balanced government capable of creating and executing law for the corporation, which government will endure until the law of equality is violated by the enactment of false law or when one branch begins to usurp the authority or power of the other branches.

In engineering, construction, manufacturing, or any type of field where something is produced, the republic is essential. First, mathematical truth (judicial) is authored into a design, a compilation of statements and formulas proposing the function of the building or machine (legislative). Once the proposal is confirmed, or judged to be in accordance with mathematical truth, the design is then executed or physically built and brought into existence (executive). If the laws for the building or machine are in accordance with mathematical truth, it will function. If not, it will be dysfunctional and subject to destruction.

Human beings are perfect examples of republics, whether we are aware of it or not. Each individual possesses an active legislative branch, or head, that is designed to author the laws or actions of the republic as a whole. These proposed laws are passed to the executive branch, or body, which is designed to judge these laws for concurrence with mathematical truth and then execute or carry out the confirmed laws. These two active branches are sealed together by a static judicial branch, or conscience, which serves as a static binary judge over the actions of the active branches. Laws (or actions) that concur with the mathematical law of equality allow the human republic to retain its liberty, or the power to continue to confirm and execute law. Laws that violate the mathematical law of equality destroy individual liberty, and the person loses the power to confirm and execute law.

These are only a few of the countless ways in which human beings naturally form republics, giving a whole new meaning to the religious expression, “God is everywhere.” Indeed, the image of God is found in all things, due to the fact that God exists as a republic. Because all things exist according to intelligent design laws, all things in existence are executions of law. Law is the product of a republic, which means that everything in existence can be traced back to the republic responsible for its creation. Republics are fractal, which means that each republic can also be traced back to the republic responsible for its creation, resulting in an infinite ancestry of republican governments. The republic is the creator of all things.

This is where we can begin to comprehend the importance of human intelligence and human liberty. Because human beings are the only forms of active intelligence that can distinguish mathematical truth from that which is not mathematical truth, only human beings can author, confirm and execute mathematical truth, or create law. The fact that law is something only human intelligence can create substantiates the statement in the last post that, “Everything in our universe, from the largest star to the smallest subatomic particle, subsists on human liberty.“

Up until this point, we have focused only on the science of a functional republic. We have uncovered the natural law that constitutes it and maintains its functionality – the law of equality. It is easy to see how the physical universe can be so ordered, reliable, and wondrously perfect when it has been created by a similarly ordered, reliable, and wondrously perfect republic. So far, the republic of God has not made any mistakes in the process of law formation. All the laws in the universe concur with mathematical truth, which means that God’s republic has correctly authored, confirmed and executed everything in existence.

However, just because all human beings are executions of the law that “All men are created equal” does not mean that all men remain in this equal state. Natural laws formed by the republic of God exist as static mathematical truth to man, and as a new iteration of human intelligence, it is man’s purpose and function to correctly author this truth into written laws and confirm and execute these laws according to the republican model. This means that God’s creation of man is in turn a creation of a new fractal republic, with God as the judicial branch and man as the active legislative and executive branches.

Of course, though the natural law of equality has always existed, it took man until 1776 A.D. to formally and correctly author this law and an even longer time to get around to the confirmation and execution of it (which execution is sporadic and inconsistent at best). This begs the question: what is the scientific consequence of man’s ignorance, repudiation, or denial of natural law?

In the previous posts it was demonstrated that static and active intelligence have an interdependent relationship, a relationship which forms the basis for law formation. Static intelligence is the origin of truth, and active (human) intelligence authors, confirms and executes truth, enabling truth to become law. On the other hand, if human intelligence can confirm truth, humans must likewise possess the ability to reject truth or at least prevent it from becoming formal law, either deliberately or ignorantly (consider the history of humanity prior to 1776). But the rejection of truth by human intelligence assumes that we have a hand in creating it, which as active intelligences, we do not. Therefore, a “rejection” of truth, or a refusal by man to author and execute the laws established by God, is not so much a rejection but rather an active confirmation of the opposite of the law in question—what we will refer to as a negation of law.

Anything that exists as truth creates or causes that which is not true, which means that all natural laws have negations, or that which exists in opposition to the law. If man does not confirm and execute the natural laws governing the creation of fire (heat, oxygen, fuel) then the result is the negation of fire – or not fire. If man does not confirm and execute the natural laws governing the creation of an electrical current, then the result is the negation of an electrical current – or not an electrical current. In this case, if man does not confirm and execute the natural law governing man’s equality, then the result is the negation of equality – or not equality, which of course is referred to as inequality. This means that instead of possessing a true ability to reject natural laws, human intelligence which refuses to confirm and execute the natural law of equality is by default confirming and executing its negation. Because the law of equality can be broken down into its correct mathematical formula, the formula for inequality must be a negation, or the mathematical opposite, of equality.

Let’s compare the law of equality and its negation side by side. Again, here is the mathematical formula for equality as described in “Laying Down The Law.”

(God > man) and (man = man) = equality

According to this law, man was intelligently designed to function with God as his superior and with man as his equal, which law results in continuous function, or in other words, eternal life.

((God > man) and (man = man) = equality) = Eternal Life

Because this law is universally true, we must now revisit the formula for inequality which was briefly suggested in the post “Laying Down The Law Part II – The Conclusion” as simply (man > man) = inequality. The fact that inequality must be a negation, or the complete opposite of, the law of equality requires a revision of this formula.

The Formula for Inequality – A Negation of Equality

According to equality, the correct order of God and man places God first and man second. For inequality, the arrangement must be incorrectly inversed.

man, God 

As the Creator of man, God must be superior to man. For inequality, man would falsely assume a position superior to or greater than his Creator.

man > God

The falsely assumed position of superiority over one’s Creator effectively nullifies any legal basis for the equality of man, so the mathematical result of this arrangement is the inequality of man by default.

man > God  =  man not equal to man  (not equal is written as !=)

This formula is a description of the opposite of equality, which of course is inequality:

(man > God) = (man != man) = inequality

Last, because the formula for equality is mathematically true, its execution yields continuous function, or eternal life. Because inequality is mathematically false, its execution must yield dysfunction and death.

((man > God) = (man != man) = inequality) = Death

Here we see that the formula for inequality is a complete negation of equality. Because the law of equality first requires the recognition of a superior God, the formula for inequality must first include the repudiation of the superiority of God by man, who places himself above his Creator. This arrangement is mathematically false because that which is created cannot be greater than, or precede, that which created it. In this arrangement, man effectively nullifies his own equality among men due to the fact that equality only exists by way of his Creator. Because all men are created equal, man’s attempt to rule over another is first a false repudiation of God and second a false arrangement of man.

The significance of the negation of the natural law of equality is that any man who does not confirm and execute the natural law of equality is by default confirming and executing its negation. This means that each of man’s actions is an execution of equality or inequality; man is either correctly placing God above himself and his fellow man equal to himself, or man is incorrectly placing himself above God and his fellow man unequal to himself. The ability of man to choose whether to confirm and execute equality or inequality reveals a paradoxical characteristic of this natural law, in that the law of equality establishes a classification of superiority and inferiority among men. The superior man is he that chooses to confirm and execute the true law of equality, which results in endurance, function and life. The inferior man is he that chooses to confirm and execute the false law of inequality, or who simply disregards the law of equality in which he then by default confirms and executes inequality to the result of dysfunction, destruction, and death. Because function and life are always superior to destruction and death, the man that chooses to execute equality will always be superior to the man that chooses to execute inequality.

Though the study of this subject is laborious and taxing, the knowledge of the law of equality and its negation is the necessary foundation for the complete understanding of all human past, present and future. Without this natural law, there is no scientific explanation for the failure or dysfunction of society, economy, government, or any institution created by man. We are left to wonder why it is that some businesses fail while others succeed, why some families disintegrate while others progress, why some nations degenerate while others prosper. Without this law we are only able to speculate on the consequences of legislation implemented by government and the repercussions of social or cultural permutations. Currently, the study of the patterns and outcomes of human behavior are considered “soft sciences,” or “social” sciences which cannot be researched quantitatively because of the lack of any specific math-based physical law governing the function of human beings. Of course, the law of equality completely destroys this premise.

The natural law of equality and its negation establishes the mathematical foundation for the scientific study of humanity. Man is a republic constituted by the law of equality; any execution of inequality will cause a republic to self-destruct according to the nature of the imbalance. Recall the example at the end of the post “Laying Down The Law Part II – The Conclusion,” how the existence of the universe is dependent upon the perfect equality of the two creative forces of electromagnetism and gravity. If these two forces are equal, life will flourish and endure. If they are not equal, the universe will self-destruct in a predictable manner, a manner which is mathematically determined by the nature of the imbalance itself. If the imbalance is in favor of electromagnetic force, the universe will predictably blow itself apart. If the imbalance is in favor of gravity, the universe will predictably collapse in on itself. Either way, imbalance (or inequality) will always result in the destruction and death of the universe according to the nature of the imbalance.

Similarly, any imbalance in the constitution of a fractal republic will also result in the destruction and death of that republic according to the nature of the imbalance. Because a republic is a representative union of the three equal keys of law formation – active authority, active power, and static authority and power (sealing), the republic is subject to destruction in four possible ways: an imbalance in favor of active authority; an imbalance in favor of active power; an imbalance in favor of active authority and power; or an imbalance in favor of static authority and power (sealing). Each imbalance causes a very specific type of dysfunction, in the same way that imbalances in any organism – cars, computers, bodies – cause specific types of dysfunction. The dysfunction and death of all republics is the next science we will examine, but this science is not without controversy. To some, this science will be the “ultimate triumph of human reason” anticipated by Stephen Hawking in the quote above, and to others, it will rock the very foundation of their existence. What we as human beings must keep in mind is that we have been intelligently designed to function according to a specific mathematical formula. And the defining characteristic of mathematics is intolerance.

The emergence of two newly rediscovered truths in the four previous posts completely revolutionizes all branches of scientific study and practice. First, it is a fact that all things in existence are intelligently designed, which establishes ordered law as the foundation of the universe. Second, it is also a fact that each ordered law can be expressed in the language of mathematics and authored into legible statements and formulas, as evidenced by the law of equality. In addition to these truths is a third and final truth which will ultimately reveal the complete design of the universe itself. The remaining element in a universe constructed of law is whether or not such laws are acknowledged (confirmed) and implemented (executed).

It is at this point where we begin to discover the role human beings have been designed to fill in this universe. Human beings differ from all other forms of active intelligence in that they are the only organisms capable of comprehending natural laws. From 1 + 1 = 2 to E=mc², human beings are the only life forms endowed with the necessary intelligence to distinguish natural law from that which is not natural law. This capacity for judgment reveals in no uncertain terms that human beings were designed to comprehend, confirm, and execute all of the natural laws of the universe. The power to confirm and execute law is called agency, or liberty.

Liberty, like equality, is often cited but rarely understood. To understand the true principle of liberty, we must revisit the natural construct of the universe described in “Laying Down The Law,” which construct is the simultaneous separation and union of static and active intelligence. These two types of intelligence naturally divide the universe into two separate branches, with each branch providing a necessary element, or key, to the formation of truth. Static intelligence provides authority; it is the branch which holds the authority to originate truth. Active intelligence provides power; it is the branch which holds the power to confirm and execute truth. Together, these interdependent branches produce all natural laws. This design reveals more about the true nature of our universe than has ever before been considered in the realm of science, by allowing us to uncover the designated process by which all natural laws are created. Because of this process, the universe in its entirety now has a scientifically substantiated purpose and function. The purpose of static and active intelligence is to become unified, and their joint function is to create and execute truth, or law. In short, the fundamental construct of the universe is a government; its sole function is the creation and execution of law.

Since human beings are the only forms of active intelligence capable of comprehending, confirming and executing natural law, it is entirely logical to assume that the government of the universe is a union of static truth and human intelligence, with static mathematical truth providing the law and human beings providing the liberty, or the confirmation and execution of the law. This simple description of government provides yet another astonishing revelation. Everything in our universe, from the largest star to the smallest subatomic particle, subsists on human liberty. Without human beings, nothing could exist physically, as static truth can create nothing of itself but is interdependent on the power of human liberty for creative organization.

The fact that things exist physically, are intelligently designed, and adhere to natural laws informs us that a government made up of static and human intelligence already exists. The proven law of equality now enables us to make our very first scientific classification: The name of this unified government is what we call ”God.” “God” is the name or title of the marriage, or union, of static truth and human intelligence, and as an institution possessing the keys of both authority and power, is responsible for the confirmation and execution of all static law, including the creation of elemental active intelligence and subsequent organization into living organisms. This explains why all things exist according to ordered law (or intelligent design): because all things are products of a government institution whose sole function is the creation and execution of law.

The knowledge of this foundational government is the most important piece of information any human being can possibly obtain. Its existence reveals that the purpose and function of man is the same as the purpose and function of “God”. It is man’s purpose and function to create and execute law in the same manner as does the universe - within governments constituted according to the pattern the universe has established. Because the definition of “God” is based on natural law, it is now possible to make scientific statements that we could not make before. It is a scientific fact that all things are intelligently designed by “God”. It is a scientific fact that “God” is a government institution made up of static and human intelligence (due to the fact that no other intelligence can comprehend natural law). It is a scientific fact that “God” is the source of all creation, and operates in the language of mathematical truth, or natural law. It is a scientific fact that “God” is a government constituted of equal and interdependent branches. These statements, though verifiably true, only offer superficial information about the institution of God. What we need now are the specifics.

What is the constitution of “God”?

To study the constitution of God, let us start with what we already know. Initially, there exist only two equal interdependent branches of intelligence, each with their own unique contribution to the legislative process. Each branch possesses its own key – the key to originate law or the key to confirm and execute law. The universal necessity of these two keys for law formation demonstrates ironically that there is a natural law governing law creation, which requires all forms of government to be constituted in a specific way. The natural law is the equal interdependence of authority and power; that which originates law has no power to confirm and execute it, and that which confirms and executes law has no authority to originate it. This is the fundamental check and balance between authority and power that static and active (or in this case, human) intelligence inherently possess upon each other.

A closer look at this construct reveals that although the universe is separated by two intelligence types, government does not and cannot function with only two branches, due to the nature of the intelligence involved. Because static intelligence is intangible and therefore does not have power to express itself in any physical way, human intelligence cannot confirm and execute law directly from this branch. For this reason, static truth must first be authored into legible statements or formulas by active intelligence before such statements can be confirmed and executed. This necessitates the formation of an active legislative branch to succeed the static branch in physically authoring the laws that static intelligence has created. After static truth has been actively authored by a legislative branch, this same branch cannot proceed to confirm and execute the law it has just authored, lest it violate the universally distinct separation of authority and power. For this reason, a third and final executive branch must then succeed the legislative branch in authorizing and executing the laws that have been authored.

All together, government constituted by natural law is a combination of three keys, or a union of the three separate and equal branches necessary for law formation, arranged in the progressive order of static to active. The first branch is the static truth from which all laws are originated. The second branch is the active legislative branch, or the branch that holds the authority to author static truth into written laws. The third and final branch is the active executive branch, which holds the power to confirm and execute the laws received by the legislative branch. This knowledge leads us to our second scientific classification: “God”, the universal government responsible for the creation of all natural law and all physical organisms, is a Republic, or a representative government which operates according to the rule of natural law.

Unfortunately, the image of this government does not add up – so far. There are two perplexing issues, one logical and the other mathematical, that must be resolved before we can begin to understand this arrangement in its entirety. The logical issue is, how can static and active intelligence form a unified government in the first place?

The fact that static intelligence is truly static and does not exist physically poses a problem for its intended unification with active human intelligence. Human beings cannot physically unify with something that is intangible. For this reason, human intelligence must come to represent the union of static and active intelligence in government, which requires active intelligence to act, or represent, each key in the process of law formation. It is easiest to comprehend this type of representation using the two active branches of government as examples, which are the legislative and the executive. Although human intelligence cannot originate law of itself, no form of government can function without the written law. Therefore, human beings must act, or represent, the static universe in this regard. The legislative branch of every government represents authority, or the authoring of law, even though human beings do not possess universal authority. The authored laws are then passed to the executive branch which represents the power of human liberty, or the power of human intelligence to judge the correctness of the authored law by analyzing its concurrence with mathematical truth. True laws are confirmed and executed by the power of the executive branch; false laws are rejected. The fact that these two active branches are representative of both authority and power leads us to our second issue.

The second problem we encounter is a mathematical one: if both the authority and power keys are represented by the legislative and executive branches respectively, what key does the static branch possess in a Republic? If there are only two keys, or parts, to legislation in the universe but three keys are required for government function, then this must mean that one of the keys of either authority or power is represented twice, causing a potential imbalance in a government supposedly based on equality. Let us now consider the function of the static branch to uncover whether this government is imbalanced in favor of authority or power.

The static branch of government is the branch responsible for the origination of all mathematical truth, or law. As the origin of mathematics, it is responsible for the association of truth to endurance and life and falseness to destruction and death, a manifestation of its own sagacious nature. By mathematically associating truth with life and falsehood with death, the static universe has secured an ironclad defense against active branches that create and execute false law: all active intelligence engaged in authoring and executing false law, or law which does not concur with mathematical truth, are statically sentenced to destruction and death. Conversely, active intelligence which author and execute true laws endure continuously, or live eternally. The association of truth to life and falseness to death reveals that the function of the static branch in a Republic is judicial by nature. Static truth serves as a binary judge of the active legislative and executive branches, by assigning an outcome of life or death to each law that is passed. Those that concur with the mathematical law of equality allow the government to live another day. However, the enactment of a single instance of inequality will mathematically trigger that government’s demise. This is the check and balance that the static branch possesses against the dual active branches that succeed it. But the question still remains, which key does the judicial branch hold?  

Here is an opportune moment to showcase human liberty – humans are fully capable of using logic and judgment to discern truth from a source that cannot speak. The mathematical association of truth to life and falseness to death is the only clue as to which key the judicial branch of government possesses, a clue that is readily discerned. Mathematical associations are, in fact, laws. The assignment of truth to life and falseness to death is thoroughly enacted legislation, or what is known as natural law. This leads us to a single, logical conclusion: because all established laws are the product of both authority and power, the key of the judicial branch must be a combination of authority and power, or one key made from two. This means that the judicial branch in a Republic is made up of an authority branch and power branch that have been previously united, and jointly represent the static intelligence of the universe in contrast to the two active branches. Because this branch is made up of two keys sealed together, it will be referred to as the sealing key, not only because it is a sealed union itself but because this preeminent key serves as a sealing agent for the dual active keys that succeed it. The sealing, or judicial branch allows all three branches to function as one entity or government, and carries the archetype for the government it has joined together. The sealing key is made up of unified human intelligence representing authority and power which has also been unified by a sealing branch of human intelligence representing authority and power, a recursive pattern that has no beginning which will repeat itself to no end.

The resolution of these two issues allows the constitution of “God” to finally come into focus. The fact that all branches of a Republic are occupied by human intelligence settles the problematic tangible-to-intangible unification issue. In a Republic, human intelligence joins with other human intelligence in a perfect representation of the static-active union, and must take on the specific characteristics of the intelligence type or key that they represent. The mathematical issue is also resolved in that the judicial branch of a Republic is self-similar to the government as a whole. This reveals that a tri-branched Republic is not imbalanced in favor of authority or power, but is in fact a perfectly balanced, perfectly functional, self-replicating institution. Here is the basic geometric image of the Republic we have just described:

Because the judicial branch is a unified authority and power key in and of itself, it is an exact replica of the government as a whole. Here is the specific geometric image of this Republic:

Those who are familiar with mathematics or biological sciences might have already identified the pattern expressed in this government. Any self-similar object, or “geometric shape that can be subdivided into parts, each of which is a smaller copy of the whole¹” is known as a fractal (short for “fractional dimension”). Fractals are often associated with recursive operations on shapes or sets of numbers, in which the result of the operation is used as the input to the same operation, repeating the process indefinitely². Fractal geometry is a relatively recent discovery ³, and its discoverers have gone on to demonstrate that the seemingly complex patterns and designs found in nature, from ferns to coastlines, are all generated by simple recursive mathematical formulas. It should then come as no surprise to discover that God, the universal government responsible for creating and executing all mathematical truth, should bear the same self-similarity it is responsible for establishing. If nature itself is designed according to self-similar mathematical equations, then it is only logical that the institution responsible for creating nature in such a manner is itself a self-similar, self-replicating institution. Due to the fact that all fractals render visible designs, not only do we have a natural law proving the existence of God, but we also have a way to render the mathematical image of God using its three-key pattern. In this case, the fractal image of God is a perfect match to what is known to mathematicians as the “Sierpinski Triangle”⁴. Here is the static design of a Sierpinski triangle, along with a progressive formation to further illustrate its pattern. 

These illustrations make it easier to understand the constitution of God, in that it is a grouping of three equal keys (each equilateral triangle is equal in size to the others), each of which are infinitely divided and multiplied by the same three-key pattern. The infinite scale of this government is evident in this animated image:

The most significant aspect of God’s infinite scale is that the source of natural law cannot be traced back to any single intelligence or being. Natural law is produced by the unification of three keys – an authority and power key sealed together by a unified authority and power key – which means that there is no one being responsible for the creation of law. This provides astonishing insight into the nature and function of God, in that God cannot be nor can ever become a tyrannical form of government, but is an institution designed to function perfectly and eternally in the process of law formation according to the checks and balances inherent to each key. Equality is an obvious element to God’s design, in that if any of the branches of government were to become imbalanced in relation to another, or in geometric terms if any of the triangles became bigger, smaller, or in any way different than the others, the fractal would become dysfunctional and self-destructive. Equality is literally the law that determines the life or death of God, man, government and law. Just as man is created equal by God and required by law to maintain this equality, so is God created equal by natural law and is likewise required to maintain its equality in function. This means that just as the constitution of man is formed by the law of equality, or (God > man) and (man = man), so is the constitution of God formed by the law of equality, only in this case the formula’s variables are replaced by the proper subjects. In man’s case, God is the creator of law, which created man as equals. In God’s case, eternal law is the creator of God, which created God as equals. This means that the equality law that constitutes the government of God is the same as the equality law that constitutes the government of man, the only difference being the subjects represented in the formula.

Let’s compare these two laws side by side. Here is the already established equality law whereby man operates:

   (God > man) and (man = man) = equality

Which is identical to the formula whereby God operates:

   (Eternal law > God) and (God = God) = equality

Now that we know that God is a recursive pattern, “Eternal law” is simply the government that created God, much like “God” is simply the government that created man. Therefore, it is man’s purpose and function to become a reiteration of this same pattern - an equally branched government which carries the necessary keys to author and execute the laws established by God. This means that it is man’s purpose to literally become as God, which is an eternally functioning Republic that serves as Creator and sealing agent for future eternally functioning Republics. Man is designed to become sealed to God as one of these future eternally functioning Republics, and to repeat this sealing pattern after acquiring the image, keys, and title of “God”. This accession is a science in and of itself which will be discussed at great detail in future posts.

For now, let us summarize the basic facts that the law of equality has proven thus far, which concern these five subjects: God, man, government, law, and also equality itself.

Equality

The law of equality has provided us with the actual definition of equality, which is (God > man) and (man = man).

Law

Law is static mathematical truth authored and ratified by human intelligence.

Government

Government is the institution responsible for producing law, which is a unified body comprised of the three separate and equal branches necessary for law formation.

Man

Man is the active intelligence designed to constitute government according to the law of equality by representing or holding the keys necessary to its function.

God

God is a unified and everlasting fractal Republic constituted by the law of equality that retains the keys to create and execute natural law on a continuous, universal scale.

Due to the rediscovery of a single natural law, each of these historically indefinite subjects are now defined in absolute terms, effectively unveiling five new branches of scientific study. This law adds to the scope of human intelligence by enabling us to obtain the knowledge of what law is, and what law is not; what government is, and what government is not; what man is, and what man is not; what God is, and what God is not. It is by this law that we are able to determine the truth or falsehood of all human thought, action or belief, a determination that applies to all of man’s religious, political, sociological, moral, economic, and cultural philosophies. In other words, it is by this law that right and wrong, good and evil, truth or falsehood, on or off, and life or death is defined. This law tells us everything we need to know about God, man, government and law, and by its formula alone is a legitimate Republic established. It is no coincidence that the Republic of the United States is patterned after the Republic of God, seeing as how they are constituted according to the exact same natural law. Of course, the remaining element in a universe constructed of law is whether or not such laws are acknowledged and implemented. The United States possesses the only legitimately constituted form of government upon the face of the Earth due to a single correctly authored founding law. Whether this government functions or malfunctions, endures or degenerates, lives or dies is wholly dependent on the power of human liberty, a power that persists only in the confirmation and execution of its founding law. True to the words of the beloved American hymn, our liberty endures in law.

(Next Post - Thy Liberty In Law Continued: The Science of Liberty)

Footnotes

1

American Psychological Association (APA):

fractal. (n.d.). The American Heritage® Science Dictionary. Retrieved September 05, 2008, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fractal

Chicago Manual Style (CMS):

fractal. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Science Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fractal (accessed: September 05, 2008).

Modern Language Association (MLA):

“fractal.” The American Heritage® Science Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company. 05 Sep. 2008. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fractal>.

2 Ibid

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fractal

3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beno%C3%AEt_Mandelbrot

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helge_von_Koch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_snowflake

http://www.ipod.org.uk/reality/reality_mathematical_universe.asp

http://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/toc.html

4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle

As was mentioned in the last post, “All men are created equal” is not a trite moral declaration, but is the most exceptional and extraordinary natural law ever acknowledged in the history of the world. This law alone holds the power to destroy all boundaries between science, philosophy, religion, morality, politics, sociology, mathematics and economics, and combine them all into one self-evident, immutable truth. Hidden in this universal law is the mathematical description of four historically indefinite subjects: God, man, government, and law. Because of the law of equality, God, man, government and even law itself are now properly subsumed within the realm of science, as they should have always been. Science is the study of truth, and we have now identified the natural law that will allow all of mankind to scientifically study, test and prove the physical laws of each.

This post will be dedicated to the scientific testing of this law as it is written. The last post explains in detail how the natural law “All men are created equal” converts mathematically to this formula:

(God > man) and (man = man) = equality

In short, this formula describes that equality among men is dependent upon the existence of a superior God. Because equality is dependent upon God in this formula, if the law of equality is true then it also proves that God exists as described in the law. However, there are many different formulas for equality that have been declared over the centuries, and many are in use today. If equality exists then it must have only one formula, and so we will conduct two scientific tests on this law. The first test is to determine the correct formula for equality, whether it be the one listed above or some other formula. Once we have the correct formula, we will conduct the second and final scientific test.

The final test will evaluate whether equality itself is true, in which we will test whether the law of equality causes mankind to become functional or dysfunctional. If equality causes disorder and dysfunction, then it is false, and the world as we know it will never be the same. If equality causes order and function, then it is true, and the world as we know it will never be the same. Consider yourselves warned.

Step 1: Testing for the correct formula for equality

“All men are created equal” is the only law of equality that is based upon the existence of a superior God. All other equality statements omit any reference to a Creator or Deity, and according to these laws equality is therefore established by man. The equality of man has only two possible sources, man himself or a source that is superior to man which created man under conditions of equality, such as a Deity or God. The test is then a simple one: Is equality originated by God or by man?

Here are examples of equality laws that do not include a Creator:

- “All men are equal.” (General statement)

- “All men are born free and equal.” (Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Constitution)

- “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights.” (The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, French Revolution, August 26 1789 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_the_Rights_of_Man_and_of_the_Citizen)

- “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” (The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), United Nations General Assembly, December 10, 1948 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights)

Let us test whether any of these statements will render proper mathematical formulas. First, let’s break these laws down into their basic components and definitions, as was done in the last post.

All = Supposedly every subject to the exclusion of none, but ultimately defined by the person making this statement

Men/Human beings = Defined by the person making this statement

Are = Defined by the person making this statement

Born = Defined by the person making this statement

Free = However “Free” is defined by the person making this statement

Equal = However “Equal” is defined by the person making this statement

Dignity = However “Dignity” is defined by the person making this statement

Rights = However “Rights” are defined by the person making this statement

There is already a problem here. Because none of these declarations are self-evident truths, or natural laws, there is no way to define any of its components in absolute, universal terms.

To render a formula, we need absolute, universal terms. Let’s just assume that I am the one making this statement, so I will enter my own definitions of the terms. We will then be able to render a mathematical formula according to my own relative terms if all others consider these terms absolute.

My Definition of Equality:

All = Every subject to the exclusion of none

Men/Human beings = all of mankind, male and female, human beings

Are = defined as, relatively

Born = brought forth by birth

Free = Unrestricted in any way

Equal = state of being equivalent, equally balanced.

Dignity = Deserving respect

Rights = Entitled to all things defined as ‘rights’ by the government

Now that the components have been defined, let’s study their mathematical arrangement in order to formulate the precise equation.

At first glance, it looks as if there is only one subject: man. In reality, there are two subjects, the men referred to in the law, and the man who authored the statement (in this case, myself). Which of these mathematically comes first? If man made the law, then mathematically the man acting as legislator comes first. The man acting as legislator then goes on to legislate law upon his fellow man, which places man after man, or second.

man, man

Now, is the man acting as legislator equivalent to his fellow man or is one greater than the other? If one man legislated a law upon others but others cannot likewise legislate law in return, or if one man can declare his terms absolute and others cannot dispute this claim, then the man who created the law is superior to, or greater than all other men.

man > man

Next, if the superior man legislated law upon all other men, what condition did he legislate upon man? Man was legislated as equal to man. After the first law describes the mathematical relationship of the lawmaking man to all other men, it then appends the first law with a second law describing the legislative relationship of man to man.

man > man and man = man

Last, what exactly does this formula describe? This formula is an attempted expression of equality. Here is the statement in its entirety:

(man > man) and (man = man) = equality

This formula is in reality a counterfeit expression of equality. The preeminent law in this equation is that the man who legislated this law is superior to the men it was legislated upon. Secondary to this law is a law establishing the equality of man. The mathematical order of these two laws is false because the second law is nullified by the first law, and therefore cannot be an expression of equality, but only a description of inequality. Here we see that man declaring the equality of other men is a self-contradiction, in that the act of absolutely declaring anything upon another man is an act of superiority, not equality. Each of these false laws of equality have been systematically exposed as to what they really are: clever and deliberate deceptions. The foolish man will see in these laws what its authors want him to see, which is the nullified law - “all men are equal” - with the added use of extravagant words such as “dignity” and “rights” to distract the fool from asking how it is that men, being unequal by nature, could ever be considered equal by law. The answer would alert the fool to his own irrationality: the only way men can be considered equal by law is because a superior man declared it to be so.

Now we can publish these false equality statements as they really are, with the nullified part of the law removed:

(man > man) = inequality

As a final test of falsehood, let us test to see if any of these statements could be true in any logical sense, or cogently identify as self-evident truths.

Are “All men equal?”

Are “All men born free and equal?”

Are “Men born free and equal in rights,” and do they “remain” that way?

Are “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights?”

The answer to all questions is a resounding No.

Is it possible that someday any of these statements could be true?

The answer to this question is also a resounding No. There is no man, however powerful, who can dictate the terms and conditions of any man’s birth, and there is no man, however powerful, who can dictate the state in which any man can remain. There is also no man, however powerful, who can grant equality to another man, because if equality originates by man, then it does not exist at all. These facts confirm the position in the previous posts that active intelligence such as man has no authority to originate law, which is what these four declarations assume.

In contrast,

Are “All men created equal?”

The answer to this question is: possibly.

If the equality statements that do not include a Creator are all scientific impossibilities, and the sole equality statement that does include a Creator is a scientific possibility, let us now finalize the correct formula with this conclusive question.

Can equality exist without a Creator?

No. Removing a Creator from the law of equality effectively renders it false. The equality of man requires a Creator, or God, as its originator, because man cannot originate it of himself without violating his own law. The American founders correctly included a Creator in the formula of equality because had they not, the formula would have been mathematically incorrect. Equality among men does not exist by nature, as one man is never born equal in health, status, intelligence or ability to another, and therefore men are not equals by nature but rule over one another according to natural advantages. Equality among men also cannot exist by man’s decree, because if one man can legislate a law of equality upon another, then either all men are equally entitled to legislate law upon each other, or all men must defer to one superior man entitled to legislate equality, rendering equality obsolete. If equality among men does not exist by nature, and cannot exist by man’s decree, then its existence is absolutely dependent upon a Creator.

Conclusion

The results are in: The formula (God > man) and (man = man) is the only possible formula for the equality of man.

Step 2: The Final Test – Is the law of equality universally true?

Because of its age and position as the founding principle of the United States, we are provided an excellent basis upon which to identify the effects of this law. Also advantageous to the analysis is the fact that the United States has uniquely embraced this law as it is written; no other nation has ever been built upon the founding principle that “all men are created equal”. Therefore the position of the United States as compared to all other nations is a valid demonstration of the truth or falseness of this law.

As it stands, the United States of America is the world’s oldest enduring republic and sole superpower. In a little over two hundred years the United States has been able to achieve a higher level of functionality than any other nation in history and generate the most wealth and prosperity the world has ever witnessed. America is undisputed in its superiority over all the nations of the world.

On the other hand, the history of the Earth has repeatedly evidenced a single path and pattern for all nations and civilizations not founded upon the natural law of equality: degeneration and destruction. All other nations are inferior to the United States presently and historically.

With this simple comparison, it would seem as though the static universe has indeed associated equality with function and inequality with dysfunction. But before we can establish this as fact, we must first understand how the laws of equality or inequality affect the nations that embrace them, and how they are composed in the first place.

How does equality or inequality shape the nations of the world?

Every nation upon the Earth is governed by a single law – a law which defines or determines who possesses the ultimate power to rule. This law is known as a “Declaration”, a law that describes the relationship of man to man. The Declaration establishes a blueprint or a formula that determines the order of the resulting government, known as the “Constitution”, or the description of how the government is constituted. The government of any nation has a sole function: to create and execute law.

Declaration  =>  Constitution  =>  Government Creation and Execution of Law

In essence, each form of government and its resultant laws can be traced back to a nation’s original Declaration. In this binary universe, the original Declaration can only describe one of two arrangements - equality or inequality, and exist in only one of two states - true or false. If the Declaration is mathematically true, then the resultant government will be constituted legitimately and will produce laws that are true, ordered, and functional, which government will endure indefinitely. If the Declaration is false, then the resultant government will be constituted illegitimately and will produce laws that are false, disordered, dysfunctional and will induce that government’s demise. If a nation has no Declaration, then the men in government have granted themselves the ultimate power to rule, so the absence of a Declaration is in fact a Declaration of inequality, and is still subject to assessment of truth or falsehood.

The Declaration in the case of the United States of America is “All men are created equal”, or in mathematical terms, (God > man) and (man = man) = equality. This declaration resulted in a government constituted of separate and equal branches designed to check and balance each other to maintain equality. Due to equality the government must also be constituted as equal to its people, inasmuch as it maintains its legitimate constitution designated by its declared law. The United States is the only nation in the history of the world to declare equality as established by God, and as such, its government is constituted upon the premise that no man possesses the ultimate power to rule, but only the superior God of equality.

In contrast, all other nations have declarations that establish equality according to the decree of man, openly assert inequality, or lack any declaration whatsoever. Thus the Declaration of all other nations is overt or covert inequality. These nations have all resulted in governments constituted of unequal branches and/or a government constituted unequal to, or superior to, its people. These nations form governments constituted upon the premise that the men in government have the ultimate power to rule.

Who declares the Declaration?

The people are the originators of their country’s declaration. It is the people that determine the relationship of their neighbors to themselves, whether they be equal or unequal. This determination is based upon various philosophies, values, or cultural tenets popular among the people. Historically, the people have declared the order of man according to what they think or desire it to be, with the sole exception of the United States, who have declared this order on the basis of natural law. The order of man relative to man is the single most important law a nation can establish, because the order in which man places himself relative to his fellow man mathematically determines the type of government he will create, as was previously shown. A government’s sole function is to create and execute law, and so the type of government man creates also determines the type of laws he will establish. Because the order of man, government and law are all interconnected in this regard, each nation possesses a distinct design, or image, dictated by its founding Declaration. The image of every nation can be readily analyzed and tested for truth, simply because its image is either one of equality or inequality.   

The American Experiment: America Proves Positive

The final test of the law of equality comes in the form of a single question, which happens to be the same question asked at the fina